Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Pentium G860 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4148 days newer than Pentium G860.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G860
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 44% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G860 - 166 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G860 - 32 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€607.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €607.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 567 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G860 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |