Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 781 days newer than Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 73 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 1% better in Minecraft than Pentium G6950 - 594 vs 587 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 6 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 3 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
