Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3677 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €25.66 vs €526.54
- Up to 94% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-13900KF - €0.14 vs €2.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Pentium G645T - 231 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 32 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
189
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.28/FPS
6%
Price, €
€526.54
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for €526.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |