Buy on Amazon
€25.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $278
Availability
MSRP in USD: $278
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 126 days older than the cheaper Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - €25.66 vs €158.88
- Up to 83% better value when playing Stray than Core i7-3770 - €0.15 vs €0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Pentium G645T - 178 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 8 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
175
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Processore Intel Pentium G645T Usato for Desktop 2-Core 2-Thread 2,5 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19276 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-3770 - Processore
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19276 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
