Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2797 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - €25.66 vs €268.88
- Up to 89% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i7-10700KF - €0.04 vs €0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 25% better in Minecraft than Pentium G645T - 740 vs 590 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 16 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
590
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12458 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
740
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
11%
Price, €
€268.88
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €268.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12458 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |