Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8350 is 51 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Up to 91% cheaper than FX-8350 - €25.66 vs €285.0
- Up to 91% better value when playing No Man's Sky than FX-8350 - €0.17 vs €1.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Pentium G645T - 157 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 8 vs 2 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
155
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15559 minutes ago
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15559 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |