Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4560 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4560 is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Performs up to 2% better in Valorant than Core i3-3220 - 706 vs 690 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 86% cheaper than Pentium G4560 - €22.08 vs €157.92
- Up to 86% better value when playing Valorant than Pentium G4560 - €0.03 vs €0.22 per FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
706
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
13.636363636363635%
Price, €
€157.92
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €157.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3720 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
690
97.73371104815864%
Value, €/FPS
€0.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €22.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3716 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
74.25742574257426%
Multi-Core
1085
74.72451790633609%
Intel Pentium G4560 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |