Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €18.25 vs €164.99
- Up to 87% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-10600K - €0.12 vs €0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3220 - 181 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
153
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €18.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10839 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
13%
Price, €
€164.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €164.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10840 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |