Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2110 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €39.9 vs €349.57
- Up to 86% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-10900KF - €0.11 vs €0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield IV than Pentium G3250 - 432 vs 376 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 20 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
376
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15414 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
432
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
13%
Price, €
€349.57
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €349.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15415 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |