Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Pentium G3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1858 days newer than Pentium G3220T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Pentium G3220T - 199 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3220T - 24 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Pentium G3220T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
