Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G2120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G2120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G2120.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2120
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €108.45 vs €349.57
- Up to 66% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-10900KF - €0.57 vs €1.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Valheim than Pentium G2120 - 207 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2120 - 20 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
190
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €108.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
33%
Price, €
€349.57
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €349.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G2120 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |