Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Core M-5Y10c on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2332 days newer than Core M-5Y10c.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y10c
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 4 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 24% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core M-5Y10c - 192 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y10c - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€163.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €163.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13924 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y10c | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core M | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
0.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
8.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |