Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 2564 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-4100 - 243 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
228
93.82716049382715%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62909 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |