Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 180 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 3400G - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €93.35 vs €427.12
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-9900KF - €0.63 vs €2.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.77/FPS
22%
Price, €
€427.12
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €427.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
149
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €93.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |