Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 560 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 182 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €142.7 vs €434.37
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €434.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75100 minutes ago
Buy for €142.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75099 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Single-Core
1452
85.86635127143703%
Multi-Core
4669
57.978393145411644%
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |