Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 734 days newer than Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G6900 - 223 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €70.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 960 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
53.079470198675494%
Multi-Core
2696
14.756431308155445%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |