Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4386 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 19% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-2400S - 211 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €69.9 vs €607.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-13900KS - €0.39 vs €2.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
211
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.88/FPS
13%
Price, €
€607.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €607.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
178
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |