Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-10700 - 231 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €254.88 vs €540.88
- Up to 47% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-13900KF - €1.23 vs €2.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
52%
Price, €
€540.88
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €540.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
89%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€254.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €254.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |