Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3170 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 21% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-4690S - 291 vs 241 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690S - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690S
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €70.78 vs €584.49
- Up to 86% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-13900F - €0.29 vs €2.01 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
291
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.01/FPS
14%
Price, €
€584.49
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €584.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 343 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
241
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 343 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-4690S |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |