Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10500.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 45% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-10500 - 551 vs 380 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10500 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €240.27 vs €419.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900F - €0.63 vs €0.76 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
551
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
82.89473684210526%
Price, €
€419
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €419 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3662 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
380
68.96551724137932%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€240.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €240.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3658 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1519
55.64102564102564%
Multi-Core
5470
31.767233869562695%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |