Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 61% better in Rust than Celeron G3900 - 256 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €60.9 vs €544.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-13900 - €0.38 vs €2.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €544.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
62%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |