Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 7% better in Stray than FX-8350 - 189 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €285.0 vs €544.99
- Up to 44% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-13900 - €1.62 vs €2.88 per FPS
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €544.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |