Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 233 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield V than Core i9-11900F - 281 vs 265 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €278.66 vs €326.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-12900K - €1.05 vs €1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
281
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
90.51724137931035%
Price, €
€326
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for €326 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58294 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
265
94.30604982206405%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€278.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €278.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58294 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
2171
82.86259541984732%
Multi-Core
9171
59.37843962447394%
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |