Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1295 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 25% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 2700X - 130 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €75.43 vs €428.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-12900K - €0.73 vs €3.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 105 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €428.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8964 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
104
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€75.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €75.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8965 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |