Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3047 days newer than Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4330 - 153 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€406
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €406 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1066
41.985033477747145%
Multi-Core
2144
15.435565154787618%
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Core i3-4330 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |