Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2433 days newer than Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Core i3-4330 - 182 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 20 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76339 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1066
62.558685446009385%
Multi-Core
2144
25.460159125994537%
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |