Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-10400F - 317 vs 295 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - €143.11 vs €268.88
- Up to 42% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-11900KF - €0.49 vs €0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
317
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
57%
Price, €
€268.88
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €268.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
295
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€143.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €143.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |