Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 482 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 25% better in World of Warcraft than Athlon 3000G - 212 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - €103.99 vs €268.88
- Up to 51% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-11900KF - €0.62 vs €1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
48%
Price, €
€268.88
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €268.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
169
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€103.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €103.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |