Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than FX-8350 - 160 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Dead Space than FX-8350 - €1.83 vs €1.97 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - €285.0 vs €292.01
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€292.01
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €292.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1577 minutes ago
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1577 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |