Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 141% better in League of Legends than Core i3-4130 - 267 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €18.24 vs €258.88
- Up to 84% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i9-11900F - €0.16 vs €0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
267
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
16%
Price, €
€258.88
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
111
41%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €18.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |