Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - €18.39 vs €258.88
- Up to 89% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i7-10700KF - €0.24 vs €2.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 50% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i3-4130 - 117 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €18.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.21/FPS
10%
Price, €
€258.88
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |