Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 2929 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 48% better in War Thunder than FX-4100 - 189 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 28 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - €22.88 vs €992.99
- Up to 97% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-10940X - €0.18 vs €5.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 95 vs 165 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €992.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313 minutes ago
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 533 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10940X | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |