Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €349.57 vs €607.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-13900KS - €0.81 vs €1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield IV than Core i9-10900KF - 499 vs 432 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
432
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€349.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €349.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 408 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
499
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
66%
Price, €
€607.99
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €607.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |