Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2515 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Rocket League than FX-9590 - 734 vs 677 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - €501.0 vs €763.04
- Up to 29% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-10900K - €0.74 vs €1.04 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
734
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
71.15384615384615%
Price, €
€763.04
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €763.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37535 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
677
92.23433242506812%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€501
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €501 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37529 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |