Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-4771 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2433 days newer than Core i7-4771.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Starfield than Core i7-4771 - 63 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i7-4771 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4771 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4771
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€272.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3726 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1193
71.18138424821002%
Multi-Core
3857
45.7749821979587%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-4771 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |