Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 478 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-9400F - 260 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 20 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €158.88 vs €288.88
- Up to 44% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-10900F - €0.62 vs €1.11 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
260
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
55%
Price, €
€288.88
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
257
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |