Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900 - 192 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €276.66 vs €359.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900 - €1.42 vs €1.98 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
94.27083333333334%
Value, €/FPS
€1.98/FPS
71.71717171717171%
Price, €
€359
77%
Buy for €359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€276.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €276.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 244 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1704
78.48917549516352%
Multi-Core
8421
91.82204775924109%
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |