Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Core i9-10885H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 270 days older than Core i9-10885H.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10885H
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10885H - 595 vs 574 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10885H - 24 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10885H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10885H | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
