Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 264 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 7 2700X - 246 vs 240 FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - €75.43 vs €328.88
- Up to 77% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-9700KF - €0.31 vs €1.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
246
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.34/FPS
23%
Price, €
€328.88
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €328.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12294 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
240
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€75.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €75.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12294 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |