Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 1173 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G6900 - 193 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - €78.7 vs €318.88
- Up to 75% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-9700K - €0.41 vs €1.65 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.65/FPS
24%
Price, €
€318.88
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €318.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700K | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |