Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 186 days older than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - €268.88 vs €438.88
- Up to 38% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-9900K - €1.98 vs €3.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-9700F - 138 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
136
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€268.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €268.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16903 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.18/FPS
62%
Price, €
€438.88
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for €438.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16903 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |