Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3027 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 28% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i7-940XM - 74 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 24 vs 8 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
74
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€635
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €635 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7421 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Clarksfield | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |