Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-8700T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 281 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-8700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-8700T - 174 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - €129.0 vs €308.12
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €308.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74108 minutes ago
Buy for €129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1322
95.93613933236574%
Multi-Core
4691
97.04178733967728%
Intel Core i7-8700T | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |