Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1394 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 3% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i3-4130T - 172 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - €30.28 vs €703.9
- Up to 96% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-7820X - €0.18 vs €4.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €703.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
167
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |