Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Core i7-7820HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 840 days newer than Core i7-7820HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820HQ
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-7820HQ - 259 vs 255 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€311.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €311.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1358 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820HQ | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |