Buy on Amazon
€231.4
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1610 - 275 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - €88.88 vs €231.4
- Up to 58% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-7700 - €0.35 vs €0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Core i7-7700 3.6GHz 8MB Cache intelligente Scatola
Buy for €231.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
251
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
