Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6900K outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1316 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Remnant II than FX-8350 - 86 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than FX-8350 - €188.88 vs €285.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Remnant II than FX-8350 - €2.2 vs €3.61 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
86
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 432 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |