Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 3288 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 25 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than Core i7-640LM - 275 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 6 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
275
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9770 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |