Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 4380 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 45% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-620M - 255 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 24 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€492.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €492.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |