Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4745 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 26% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-620M - 194 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 32 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€719.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €719.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 505 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raphael |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |